New in ABCDEF Studio: LinkedIn Spacing, Required Links, and Backups
A small formatting mismatch can make a polished post look a little less polished. A must-include page can disappear from an article draft. And a backup is more useful when you can keep a copy, not only restore it.
We’ve made a set of updates to help with those everyday tasks: LinkedIn post spacing now matches the preview, article drafts have clearer link instructions, and platform administrators can download automatic backups from Setup. Here’s what changed and when you’ll notice it.
LinkedIn spacing now matches the preview
LinkedIn posts now keep the paragraph spacing you see in the preview. That means one blank line between paragraphs stays one blank line when the post is shared, instead of turning into two.
It’s a small detail, but spacing affects how a post reads on the page. Extra gaps can make a short update feel oddly stretched out, like it’s waiting for someone to bring the conversation back. Now what you preview is what gets posted.
The fix also applies to posts that were already queued. You don’t need to rebuild those posts just to get the corrected spacing.
Mark the links your article must include
Drafts now have a “Links it must use” field. Use it to list the pages an article is required to link to, such as a product page or pricing page. Optional links can stay separate, so the writer can tell the difference between a must-have and a page that may be useful if it fits.
That distinction helps when a brief has several possible sources or destinations. Before, every link in a brief was optional. A key page could be included, but there wasn’t a way to mark it as required. Now you can make that instruction clear in the draft itself.
Think of it as giving the writer two lists: “These pages need to appear in the article,” and “These pages are available if they make sense.” That leaves room for editorial judgment without leaving an important destination to chance.
Catch missing links before approval
AI writers can miss an instruction, including a link instruction. Article Health now checks for missing must-use links and flags the missing page by name before anyone can approve the article. That makes it easier to spot the gap while the draft is still being reviewed, rather than after it has made its way to your site.
The named flag matters. A general warning that says a link is missing leaves you to hunt through the brief and figure out which one. A flag that identifies the page gives you a clear item to check. If a required product page is absent, you can see that specific issue and have the draft corrected before approval.
Required links also don’t count against your link limits. Those limits apply to links the writer chooses on its own, not pages you specifically asked the article to include. So you can require a key destination without having it treated as an extra link that pushes the draft over its limit.
Between the field and the Article Health check, the instruction is clearer at the start and easier to verify at the end. Less link detective work, more time to read the article itself.
Draft with link instructions in chat
If you start a draft through Claude, Meta Muse, or another assistant connected to ABCDEF Studio, the assistant now asks which pages the article must link to and which it may link to. That gives you the same required-versus-optional link control when you begin in chat.
Why ask in the conversation? Because a useful instruction is one that arrives before the writing starts. You can identify the required pages up front, then leave optional pages available for the assistant to use when they suit the piece. Drafts started from chat get the same link controls as other drafts.
That doesn’t change the point of the review step. Article Health still flags a required link if it’s missing, so you have a clear check before approval.